A teenager just wanted to run. Adults made her a target.

By Dr Helen WebberleyResponding to Oregon Public Broadcasting - OPB21 October 20266 min read

A trans teenager in Camas, Washington, joined her school's girls cross-country team and placed well in several races. Adults then named her publicly, organised a protest against her, and made her the centrepiece of a state ballot campaign. She is a minor who has not spoken publicly. She just wanted to run.

A teenager just wanted to run. Adults made her a target.

Photo by Haley Harms on Unsplash

A trans teenager in Camas, Washington, joined her school's girls cross-country team and placed well in several races. Adults then named her publicly, organised a protest against her, and made her the centrepiece of a state ballot campaign. She is a minor who has not spoken publicly. She just wanted to run.

I want to start there, because it is easy to lose the person inside a story like this. She is a junior at Camas High School. She ran with the boys' team earlier in the season. Then she ran with the girls. She placed second in one race. She placed first in another. And then the internet found her.

What actually happened

A blog called "He Cheated," which crowds-ources and publishes the identities of trans athletes, posted her name and results. A right-wing influencer named Brandi Kruse amplified the story on X, commenting on a photo of the girl standing among her teammates: "Gee, which one is the boy?" That post was shared tens of thousands of times. A local anti-trans activist filmed a walkout by half the Camas girls' team at a match on October 13, and the video went national. Riley Gaines, who has built a prominent public profile as a critic of trans athletes in women's sport, weighed in. The league had to move a subsequent track meet due to security concerns.

All of this happened to a child who has said nothing publicly, whose family has said nothing publicly, and who, as far as anyone can tell from the reporting, simply wanted to be on the team.

Who is really driving this

Washington state has a ballot initiative coming, I-638, backed by a wealthy hedge fund manager named Brian Heywood and his organisation Let's Go Washington. It would ban trans girls from girls' school sports and, critics say, require invasive proof of sex through genital exams, cheek swabs, or blood tests that no other student is required to provide. Half of US states have some form of ban already; supporters argue this one would be the harshest yet.

Brian Heywood posted about the Camas runner on X: "This boy started the season on the boys team. When the initiative passes, he can go back to the boys team. No problem." He referred to a teenage girl as a boy. He used her situation as a campaign advertisement. And he did it in a way that makes it sound tidy and kind, as though forcing a child off a team she chose is a solution rather than a harm.

The Washington Interscholastic Activities Association has allowed students to compete in line with their gender identity for nearly twenty years. In all that time, the association estimates fewer than ten trans athletes are currently competing in school sport across the entire state. Ten. In a state with hundreds of thousands of students.

What the adults in the room actually said

John Gallagher, a former high school cross-country coach who has worked with trans runners alongside cisgender teammates, put it plainly: "This is one child." He said he had never encountered walkoffs or protests in his own coaching experience, and he was clear about what he believed was happening. Adults, he said, had stepped in and told student athletes what they needed to do to make a statement. He described the energy directed at a single teammate as "antithetical to the ethos of cross-country."

Chris Reykdal, the state's education chief, acknowledged the girls had a right to protest while pointing out the real cost of the alternative: a system where every girl has to prove through one of three methods that she is a girl in order to participate in school sport. That is where the logic of this initiative leads, not just trans girls under scrutiny, but every girl.

The machinery behind a "viral moment"

I have seen this pattern before. A trans young person lives their life. Someone with a platform decides they are useful. A website names them. An influencer frames it. A video is posted. And suddenly that child's face, name, and race results are everywhere, and the people who put them there are talking about fairness.

The timing here is not subtle. The vote on I-638 is next month. The Democratic Party spokesperson in Washington said, with unusual candour, that progressives have struggled to match the social media tactics the right deploys around manufactured outrage. I understand the frustration, but the more important point is this: the outrage is being manufactured around real children. There is a real teenager at the centre of this. She did not volunteer for any of it.

What cross-country is actually like

Cross-country running is one of the most egalitarian school sports there is. You run. You finish. You cheer for your teammates. Coaches who have spent careers in the sport will tell you that the culture is built on mutual support, on getting round the course, on the peculiar solidarity of suffering together over five kilometres of muddy ground. The idea that a team would walk off a course to protest a teammate rather than simply run alongside her is, as Gallagher said, antithetical to everything the sport is supposed to be. And the idea that adults organised it, filmed it, and uploaded it to be amplified nationally makes it worse, not better.

She placed first in a varsity race. I would love to say that again: she placed first. That is a teenager who trained, showed up, and ran well. And her reward was to become the subject of a blog, a viral tweet, a filmed protest, and a ballot campaign. Because adults decided she was more useful as a symbol than as a person.

The law, as it stands

The school district said it is following applicable laws and rules, which is accurate. The WIAA policy has been in place for nearly two decades. The initiative has not yet passed. Until and unless it does, this student has every right to compete, and the district has an obligation to protect her while she does. Security concerns forcing a venue change should be a warning sign, not a footnote.

If I-638 passes, trans girls in Washington will face mandatory invasive testing simply to participate in school sport. Every girl may face it. The people backing the initiative describe this as protecting women. I would ask them to look at this teenager and tell me what they are protecting her from.

If there is a news story you would like me to cover then just let Sammy know.

Dr Helen Webberley is a Gender Specialist, Medical Educator, and advocate for trans rights and gender diversity.

In response toProtest in Southwest Washington against trans runner on girls cross-country team goes viralOregon Public Broadcasting - OPB

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Talk to Sammy