Doctors pump children with damaging irreversible puberty blockers
Ben Leo said:
“You then pump them with damaging irreversible Damaging irreversible puberty blockers and hormones.”
The word 'pump' implies reckless over-prescription, and 'irreversible' is a word that carries obvious weight when applied to children. Many viewers will have seen headlines about puberty blockers and will find the characterisation plausible.
Puberty blockers are GnRH analogues, a class of medication used for decades in children with precocious puberty, where the goal is exactly the same: to pause a process before it runs ahead of where a child is. When the medication stops, puberty resumes. That is what reversible means, and it is not in serious dispute. The word "damaging" does a lot of work in that sentence without doing any of the evidence: the honest picture is that research is ongoing, that clinicians weigh benefit against risk for every individual child, and that this is exactly what careful medicine looks like in any speciality. What is not in dispute is the cost of getting the timing wrong. Puberty does not pause while a family searches for certainty, and every month of an unwanted one leaves physical changes that no amount of later treatment can fully undo. Families frightened away from an early clinical conversation by the word "irreversible" are not being kept safe: they are being handed a door that closes a little more with each passing month.
What I said at the time:
“Puberty blockers are the best best time for puberty blockers is when puberty starts.”
Young people with gender dysphoria and their families who are frightened away from a clinical conversation by language designed to alarm rather than inform.